Board of Equalization and Review
Orange County ·
Board of Equalization & Review
Tuesday, May 27, 2025
Agenda document Minutes Watch Meeting recap
What was decided
- Denied IIAppeals Hearings Three exclusions denied, one granted, five valuations and one late application decided
Read from the agenda's recorded outcomes. Where the board published minutes, those are the record — this is a pointer to them.
What's on this agenda
Fifteen quarter-hour slots on the agenda before the Board of Equalization and Review at West Campus. Unlike most of its sittings, this one is largely about who qualifies for a property tax exclusion rather than what a property is worth.
Summarized from the published agenda. Read the agenda itself before acting on it.
Meeting recap
What happened, drawn from the records published after the meeting. Minutes
Ten matters in an hour and three quarters, and half of them were about exclusions rather than valuations — the programmes that take an elderly, disabled or veteran homeowner partly out of the tax base.
The board denied three exclusion claims and granted one. To qualify for the elderly or disabled exclusion an owner must, on 1 January, be at least 65 or totally and permanently disabled, be a North Carolina resident, own and occupy the home, and have had income the previous year no higher than the limit, which for the 2024 tax year meant 2023 income of $36,700 or less. The one that succeeded came in two votes. The owner had been denied for 2024 because she never supplied the 2023 income figure, and her appeal was late because of a medical hardship. The board voted first to accept the late appeal, then separately to grant the exclusion. Two other elderly or disabled claims and one disabled veteran claim were denied, all unanimously.
Five valuation appeals followed, none of the owners present. One late Present Use Value application closed the afternoon. The chair suggested that appeals of the same type be scheduled together where possible, which would help the board members; the afternoon's mix of exclusions, valuations and late filings is presumably what prompted it. A discussion of letters sent to the board by appellants and property owners about the 2025 tax rate was put off to a later meeting.
How the votes went
Ten matters, every decision unanimous with no recorded opposition. The successful late appeal took two separate motions, one to accept the appeal and one to grant the exclusion.
From the published minutes.
Speaking at this meeting
Orange County's own rules for public comment — check them before you rely on anything here.
Agenda items (4)
-
I Call to OrderProcedural
-
II Appeals HearingsTen matters between 1:00 and 2:44 PM. Four concerned exclusions: three denials upheld, covering the elderly or disabled exclusion under G.S. 105-277.1 and the disabled veteran exclusion under G.S. 105-277.1C, and one granted after the board first accepted a late appeal filed because of a medical hardship. Five were valuation appeals with no owner present, and one was a late Present Use Value application.Three exclusions denied, one granted, five valuations and one late application decided
-
III Related Meeting NotesThe chair asked that appeals of the same type be scheduled together where possible. Discussion of letters from appellants and property owners about the 2025 tax rate was postponed to a later meeting.
-
IV AdjournmentProceduralAdjourned 2:44 PM
Other recent meetings of this board
-
Thu, Aug 13time not posted
-
Wed, Aug 12time not posted
-
Tue, Aug 11time not posted
-
Thu, Aug 6time not posted7 items
-
Wed, Aug 5time not posted8 items